Risk Management
Flat-list risk register for engineering, manufacturing, and operational risks
Last updated: 2026-05-14
Risk Management is a flat-list risk register that lives inside each project. Use it to track engineering, manufacturing, and operational risks against a deliverable in one structured place, instead of scattering them across Slack threads and meeting notes.
Concepts
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Title | Short, descriptive label (e.g. "Single-source MCU at risk of EOL"). |
| Description | Free-text. What is the risk? What is the worst-case scenario? |
| Severity | Low, Medium, High, Critical. The impact if the risk materialises. |
| Likelihood | Rare, Unlikely, Possible, Likely, Almost Certain. The probability. |
| Status | Open, Mitigating, Closed. Where you are in the response. |
| Owner | The person responsible for tracking it. Pulled from the project's team. |
| Mitigation | Free-text. The plan to reduce or eliminate the risk. |
| Linked items | Optional. Commits, devices, tickets, or RMAs the risk connects to. |
Before you start
- Decide who owns the register. Usually the engineering lead, sometimes a dedicated NPI manager. The owner reviews the list weekly.
- Define your severity and likelihood scale up front. S3Suite uses fixed labels (Low / Medium / High / Critical for severity, and Rare → Almost Certain for likelihood), but your team should agree on what each one means for your product. Write the definitions in the project's Knowledge Base.
Quick start (5 minutes)
1. Open the register
- Open your project
- In the sidebar, go to Engineering → Risk Management
- You land on the flat list of risks. New project = empty list.
2. Add your first risk
- Click New Risk
- Fill in:
- Click Create
3. Update status directly from the row
- Find a risk in the list
- Click the Status dropdown directly in the row (no need to open the full detail)
- Pick the new status (Open / Mitigating / Closed)
Workflow: weekly risk review
Most teams find a weekly 15-minute risk review pays for itself in avoided fire drills.
- Open Engineering → Risk Management
- Set the Status filter to Open + Mitigating (hide closed)
- Sort by Severity (descending)
- For each top-of-list risk:
- Add any new risks surfaced during the meeting
Workflow: linking a risk to a design change
When a design change introduces a risk (or addresses one), link the two so the audit trail is intact.
- Open the risk detail page (click the row in the list)
- In the Linked items panel, click Add link
- Pick:
- Save
Workflow: closing a risk
- Open the risk detail page
- Move status to Closed
- Add a closing note in mitigation. What eliminated the risk? E.g. "Switched to multi-sourced MCU XYZ. EOL no longer applies."
- Save
Tip: Do not delete closed risks. The history of "we tracked this risk, we closed it on date X for reason Y" is what makes the register defensible in an audit.
Reference
Severity definitions (default starting point)
These are the labels S3Suite ships with. Your team is free to redefine them, but document the definition in the project knowledge base.
- Low - inconvenience only, no production impact.
- Medium - manageable production delay or rework.
- High - significant production delay, customer impact, or compliance issue.
- Critical - product cannot ship, customer safety concern, or regulatory blocker.
Likelihood definitions (default starting point)
- Rare - has not happened, no known path.
- Unlikely - theoretically possible but no evidence.
- Possible - has happened in similar projects.
- Likely - has happened in this project before, or in a recent project.
- Almost Certain - happening now or imminent.
Filters available in the list
- Status - Open / Mitigating / Closed / All
- Severity - any combination
- Owner - filter to your own risks
- Search - free text against title and description
Common pitfalls
- "We tracked the same risk in three different places." Use linked items to consolidate. One risk, multiple links to commits / tickets / devices.
- "The register is full of stale Open risks." Schedule a weekly review. Stale Open risks are noise that hides real risks.
- "Severity and likelihood disagree with the mitigation plan." A Critical + Almost Certain risk needs an active mitigation plan, not "TBD". If you cannot mitigate it, escalate.
Related docs
- Hardware Revision Control -link risks to specific commits that introduced or addressed them
- RMA and Troubleshooting -field failures often surface new risks
- Knowledge Base and Diary -where to write the team's risk-scale definitions